- Breakout Capital Group
- Posts
- How to Stop Pitching Family Offices Like They're VC's
How to Stop Pitching Family Offices Like They're VC's
diving into their differences, areas they focus on, and how to position yourself to both of them
I was speaking to a gentleman this morning who didn’t fully know what a Family Office was - so let’s explain and shine some light on how they operate.
In fundraising, most founders throw every investor into the same bucket.
VCs. Angels. Corporates. Family offices. It’s all just “capital.”
But the truth is that family offices operate on a completely different playbook than traditional VC funds. And if you pitch them the same way, you’ll miss the mark.
VCs vs. Family Offices
VCs are fund managers.
They raise capital from LPs, deploy into companies, and try to return the fund in 10 years or less.
Their check-writing is tied to fund math: ownership targets, follow-on reserves, and strict portfolio construction.
Every investment decision comes back to one question:
“Can this be a fund-returner in 5–7 years?”
Family offices are not bound by that structure.
They manage their own capital, built from generational wealth or a founder’s exit.
There are no LPs. No clock running out.
Their mandate is self-defined - sometimes preservation, sometimes legacy, sometimes conviction bets in sectors they know deeply.
What That Means for You
Time Horizon → A VC is racing against their fund cycle. A family office can hold indefinitely. They want resilience, durability, and long-term compounding more than quick flips.
Check Sizing → VC commitments are dictated by portfolio math. Family offices can go smaller or bigger depending on conviction. They might write $500K or $50M depending on the family’s balance sheet and interests.
Decision Process → A VC investment committee can be political and slow. A family office often comes down to one or two principals. Convince them personally, and you’re through.
Strategic Alignment → Many families invest in the industries they know - the same industries that created their wealth. If they made money in real estate, healthcare, or energy, they’ll lean toward those sectors. Pitch into that familiarity.
Risk Profile → VCs need moonshots because that’s how they return funds. Family offices are comfortable with de-risked growth, yield, or structures that protect downside. They typically like co-investments and opportunities with optionality.
When you pitch a VC, you’re asking them to put their career and fund returns on the line.
When you pitch a family office, you’re speaking to a principal who’s thinking in decades and legacy.
That means your story has to shift:
Less about the “fund returner” slide.
More about durability, resilience, and how you align with their vision of wealth stewardship.
The Takeaway
Family offices aren’t just “slower VCs.”
They’re playing an entirely different game. They don’t care about chasing the hottest AI trend just because Tiger Global does.
They care about whether this is a business they can back proudly for the next 20 years.
If you learn to speak their language, you’ll open up a pool of capital that is quieter, more patient, and often far more aligned with building enduring companies.
This is exactly the kind of shift we help our clients engineer at Breakout - taking the same story and tailoring it for different audiences in the capital markets.
Because what works on a VC doesn’t work on a family office, and vice versa.
How are you positioning your raise right now?
Are you tailoring your narrative to the different capital groups you’re targeting?
Shoot me a reply if you’d like us to take a look at it.
Have a great day,
Ryan
Breakout Capital Group